Skip to main content

Arjan Singh was the only officer of the Indian Air Force to be promoted to the five-star rank equivalent to a Field Marshal. Air Marshal Singh led the Indian Air Force in the 1965 war with Pakistan which he says was prematurely terminated on intervention by the United Nations.


  • New Delhi: Arjan Singh was the only officer of the Indian Air Force to be promoted to the five-star rank equivalent to a Field Marshal. Air Marshal Singh led the Indian Air Force in the 1965 war with Pakistan which he says was prematurely terminated on intervention by the United Nations. Had it gone on for a few more days, India's victory would have been decisive.

    Born in Punjab town of Lyallpur (now Faisalabad, Pakistan), Singh was Chief of the Air Staff from August 1, 1964, to July 15, 1969, and was awarded the Padma Vibhushan in 1965.

    Now 96 years old, Air Marshal Arjan Singh revisits the 1965 India-Pakistan war in an email interview with IANS saying that the IAF, though initially surprised by the attack, gained air superiority over Pakistan in three days which crippled their air force.

    Excerpts:

    Q. Do you feel the Indian Air Force was able to outsmart the Pakistan Air Force in the 1965 War?

    A. When the Pakistan Air Force attacked our bases in Pathankot and Kalaikunda, we suffered initial reverses. However, the Indian Air Force was given a go-ahead by then defence minister Yaswantrao Chavan, our great Maratha Leader, to launch the air attack. We were able to recover the operational balance quickly and later achieved complete air superiority over them within three days. The aircraft from Pathankot, Ambala and Adampur were able to strike at all the major air bases in Pakistan like Sargodha, Peshawar, Kohat and so on. The air attacks were planned in such a manner that our aircraft would fly over Kashmir valley which provided us covers against the radar detection in Pakistan.

    We were able to destroy the major supply lines and vital installations in almost all Pakistani cities. Pakistan does not have much width and according to our information they moved their aircraft to safer location in Afghanistan in a place called Zahidan.

    Q. Both India and Pakistan claim victory in the war. Why do you think we won?

    A. For political reasons, Pakistan claims victory in the 1965 war. In my opinion, the war ended in a kind of stalemate. We were in a position of strength. Had the war continued for a few more days, we would have gained a decisive victory. I advised then prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri not to agree for ceasefire. But I think he was under pressure from the United Nations and some countries. Shastri was not really a weak man at all. He was a tough man and clear in his decision making. He was in fact a man of peace and never wanted the population of either country to suffer because of the war. He gave only one direction - try not to hit the civilian population.

    Q. Do you feel the war was a turning point in establishing the air force as an entity that could ably back the ground forces?

    A. The Indian Air Force was actively involved during the Second World War. I was commanding No.1 Squadron at Imphal where it was involved in the Burma operations with the Japanese. Later in 1948, IAF also actively supported the ground forces in Kashmir. We did not fight at all in 1962. But I must tell you - three months before the 1965 war, I spoke to Shastri and advised him to use IAF in any future war. We were given a decisive go ahead by the leadership in 1965 and IAF performed exceptionally well. IAF was able to do much damage in Pakistan.

    Q. Would it be correct to say that the 1965 War saw aircraft of IAF and PAF engage in combat for the first time? Back then, how did you compare India's preparedness with Pakistan?

    A. Pakistan had qualitatively and technologically superior aircraft like Sabres and Starfighters. We had Gnats, Hunters, Mysteres and Vampires. Pakistan had massive American support. They had the latest radars which gave them much coverage and therefore the edge. I think they became overconfident that IAF will not be used in the war as happened in the 1962 India-China War. From the time IAF was pressed into action, the operational balance started shifting towards our side. This shows that IAF was operationally ready for any misadventure by the enemy.

    Q. As far as the IAF is concerned, what were the areas where we excelled? At the same time, what were the areas we didn't do as well as you had expected? Where did we fail and why?

    A. In a war, the aggressor will always have an initial advantage. Pakistan attacked us and we suffered initial losses. We regained the operational balance quickly. Pakistanis are good fighters. But here we were fighting for our country against an aggressor. Our pilots fought with valour and courage and instilled fear among the enemy.

    In hindsight, I feel I should not have used the Vampires in the war as they were slow to maneouvre and were generally vulnerable. After the war, we started the modernisation of our Air Force by recommending the purchase of modern aircraft and radars.

    Q. For someone who was at the helm of affairs, what were your anxious moments during the war?

    A. I was neither anxious nor nervous during 1965. I was confident of our ability and operational preparedness. During the peace time, we are trained to fight. I had actively seen operations during the Second World War. We were 21 pilots who had gone to Imphal to fight against the Japanese Air Force and only five returned. I was there for one year and that experience matured me immensely.

    Q. How do you recall your interactions with political leaders during war time? Were there any points of disagreement between the IAF and the political leadership and how was it resolved?

    A. I must tell you that Pakistan tried to cut off Jammu and Kashmir through an armoured-cum-infantry attack on the Akhnoor Sector. Gen J.N. Chaudhari came to my office in Vayu Bhawan and told me that unless the IAF steps in, it would be difficult to stop the Pakistanis in the Chamb-Jaurian sector. I told him that with IAF involvement, the conflict will escalate to a full-fledged war. We went to the then defence minister Chavan who asked me if IAF was ready. I promptly said yes. In the next minute, he gave a decision to go ahead to launch the strikes. This decisive leadership in 1965 was very important in achieving an operational edge with Pakistan.

    Q. Do you feel there are chances of India going to war with Pakistan again? If that happens, are we better prepared than Pakistan?

    A. The tensions with Pakistan will continue and I don't see any solution to the problem. The proxy war in Kashmir is not doing any good to the relations between us. The recent ceasefire violations where some of our troops were killed is not acceptable at all. Beheading of soldiers is not an act done by any civilized army. The world knows that the Pakistan sponsored terrorists are infiltrating through the LoC (Line of Control) to create trouble for us.

    followed by, http://www.defencenews.in/

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Border brawl: China choppers were in air

    Indian Air Force's Sukhoi 30 fighter aircraft  (File picture) Two helicopters of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army hovered close to the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh on May 5 and Indian Air Force fighter jets had also been airborne at the same time during a face-off between soldiers near the Pangong lake, sources in the army headquarters said on Tuesday. The latest revelations come at a time there has been an escalation in tension in pockets of the disputed frontier. “The Indian Air Force is regularly carrying out sorties of its Sukhoi 30 fighter aircraft in the Ladakh sector amid the simmering tension with China in the region. During the face-off last week, two Chinese choppers had come close to the border but there was no air space violation. The IAF’s Sukhoi 30 fighter jets were also airborne at the same time but it was routine flying and not in response to Chinese helicopters,” a source said. Chinese PLA Choppers Spotted Near LAC; IAF Rushes Fighter Jets To Ladakh...

    Indian Army looking for new armoured vehicles for Ladakh, Tata among contenders

    Humvee and American Stryker Infantry Combat Vehicle are the two others who are also being considered by the Indian Army to deliver such vehicles. Photo of a Tata Defence Combat Light Armored Multi Role Vehicle Seeking to provide highly mobile armoured protection vehicles to its soldiers in high altitude terrains like Eastern Ladakh, the Indian Army is looking to choose from three different vehicles including the indigenous Tata Wheeled Armoured Protection along with American Stryker Infantry Combat Vehicle and Humvee. The Indian Army has a need for armoured infantry combat vehicles for quick movement of troops in the Eastern Ladakh area where the Chinese have deployed their armoured personnel carriers in large numbers. The force is looking at the three options which include the Tata WhAP and the American Stryker and Humvee, defence sources told ANI. The options are being evaluated by the force at the moment and a decision in this regard would be taken soon, they said. Sources said duri...

    ‘Disengagement an intricate process, needs constant verification’: Army

    The government’s high-powered China Study Group (CSG) on Wednesday reviewed the latest developments in eastern Ladakh, with focus on the next stage of disengagement between the Indian and Chinese armies following the 14-hour meeting between senior military commanders.   The focus of the current round of military talks is to hammer out a consensus on easing tensions between the two armies in the Finger Area and Depsang plains as well as pulling back weapons and equipment from friction points in other sectors.(PTI) India and China remain committed to “complete disengagement” which is an “intricate process” and “requires constant verification”, the Indian Army said in a statement on Thursday, two days after senior military commanders from both sides met at Chushul to discuss the road map for reducing tensions along the contested Line of Actual Control (LAC). “The senior commanders reviewed the progress on implementation of the first phase of disengagement and discussed further step...